Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lynelle Paulick's avatar

Hi Phil and Maude. Regarding the comment, "Jonathan Haidt has found that for some people, authority and loyalty are more important values than fairness. Phil can imagine that, in those relationships, decisions are made according to the power structure" -- I haven't read Haidt's material, so I wouldn't want to misinterpret by making assumptions...but I want to ask if You could explain how these two are diametrically opposed? I can easily imagine a relationship, whether personal or collective, in which the two function together seamlessly! However, I cannot imagine a relationship (especially a personal one!) truly working for both in a positive way when based on one -- authority and loyalty -- so I assume you're utilizing his remarks to make a political statement? Can you clarify and expand on these? xo

Expand full comment
Jeanine Kitchel's avatar

Another fabulous exposé on what a good relationship is, Phil & Maude. I so agree that division of duties/chores in a fair fashion can very well create or demolish a relationship. Paul and I have distinct tasks, it just worked out that way, so we know what to do. Never have to ask each other to do it, it's already in 'the system.' After college I had a lot of roommates over the years and learned the way around group discussions and chores. Maybe that assisted in my later life relationships? (or being from a large family, too). I also think humor is important. Paul and I share the same sense of humor. I just love reading about someone having a good relationship. Keep 'em coming!

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts